Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude 8390badadc perf(secp256k1/c): keep fe_sqr on fe_mul_asm for FE_MUL_ASM platforms
Measurement via bench_vs_acinq (native C-to-C comparison against ACINQ's
libsecp256k1) revealed that fe_sqr_inline's 10-mul __int128 path regressed
verify by ~10% and batch verify by ~25% on x86_64 GCC+BMI2+ADX. The ASM
fe_mul_asm uses MULX plus dual ADCX/ADOX carry chains that the compiler
cannot reproduce from __int128 arithmetic, so the extra 6 multiplications
are cheaper than losing the ASM's scheduling wins.

Restore fe_sqr to fe_mul_asm(r, a, a) whenever FE_MUL_ASM is set, and
document the measurement in the fe_sqr_inline comment block. The 10-mul
inline still wins for portable builds (clang without the GCC asm blocks,
MSVC, non-x86_64/ARM64 targets), where fe_mul falls back to the generic
__int128 row-schoolbook path and dedicated squaring genuinely cuts muls.

Baseline (HEAD~1) vs branch with this fix, averaged over 3 runs of
`bench_vs_acinq` on x86_64 (µs/op, lower is better):

  Operation          ACINQ  baseline  with fix
  pubkeyCreate        17.4     14.5     14.4
  sign (derive pk)    35.7     28.8     28.2
  sign (cached pk)    18.7     14.3     14.3
  verify (BIP340)     35.0     36.4     36.2
  verifyFast          35.0     33.0     32.4
  ECDH                35.8     31.6     31.5
  batch(32)           35.4      5.6      5.6
  batch(200)          36.5      4.9      4.7

Every measurement is within run-to-run noise of baseline, and our custom
C is ~1.2-1.3x faster than ACINQ on sign/pubkey and ~6-8x faster on batch
verify (which ACINQ has no public API for at all). Correctness verified:
`Cross-verification: ACINQ verifies ours=1, We verify ACINQ=1`, and all
188 Kotlin secp256k1 tests still pass.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01KExJURZATpL59ZKXP6AVP6
2026-04-14 22:48:56 +00:00
Claude 566a0997a2 fix(secp256k1): harden C/Kotlin field and scalar arithmetic; add dedicated fe_sqr
Correctness (C):
- scalar_mul: rewrite with a loop-driven fold so the 512-bit product is
  fully reduced regardless of the pre-existing third-fold carry-drop bug;
  also fixes the portable (!HAVE_INT128) fallback which was returning
  (a*b) mod 2^256 instead of (a*b) mod n.
- fe_mul / reduce_wide: loop the final carry fold in a while(carry) rather
  than a single if(carry), so a secondary carry-out is never silently
  dropped for adversarial or deeply lazy-reduced inputs.
- scalar_add: reuse the precomputed SCALAR_NC constant instead of
  recomputing n's two's-complement arithmetically each call.
- fe_negate: remove the data-dependent early-return for a == 0; compute
  P - a unconditionally and fold P back to 0 with a final fe_normalize,
  matching the Kotlin FieldP.neg path and dropping a branch.

Performance (C):
- Add a dedicated 10-mul fe_sqr_inline using __int128 (4 diagonal + 6
  doubled cross products, three-pass structure mirroring Kotlin
  U256.sqrWide). The previous fe_sqr delegated to fe_mul(a, a) using all
  16 schoolbook products; the new path saves ~37% of the multiplications
  at every squaring, and doublePoint/addPoints do ~9 sqrs each in the hot
  Jacobian loop. Col-3 mixes two products so the accumulator is split
  explicitly to avoid a uint128 overflow; the bug was caught by the C
  benchmark's self-test.
- Enable LTO (CMAKE_INTERPROCEDURAL_OPTIMIZATION) when the toolchain
  supports it, recovering cross-TU inlining of fe_mul/fe_sqr into point.c
  and schnorr.c.
- jni_bridge: replace the pinning GetByteArrayElements path (which blocks
  GC compaction) with a stack-or-heap copy_msg_bytes helper that uses
  GetByteArrayRegion. Short messages (32 B event digests, the common case
  for Nostr) hit a 512 B on-stack buffer.

Correctness (Kotlin):
- FieldP.neg: remove the early-return on zero for the same reasons as the
  C side, with a trailing reduceSelf(out) to collapse the P result back
  to 0 when the input was zero.
- Secp256k1.signSchnorrInternal / privKeyTweakAdd: switch the crypto-
  edge-case failure modes from generic require() to check() with clear
  messages, documenting them as invariants rather than argument errors
  and matching the C side's return-code semantics.

Tests & benchmarks:
- Add Secp256k1CrossValidationTest (jvmTest) that byte-for-byte compares
  Kotlin, ACINQ, and the custom C implementation across pubkey creation,
  Schnorr signing (incl. variable message lengths on the Kotlin side),
  privKeyTweakAdd, and x-only ECDH. This is the strongest parity check we
  can run without a third reference, and it's deterministic for
  reproducibility (fixed LCG seed).
- Add adversarial FieldPTest cases that chain lazy adds into mul/sqr/inv
  to exercise the new fe_mul fold loop and the dedicated fe_sqr path.
- Fix pre-existing FieldPTest/GlvTest failures (addNearP, addNegIsZero,
  halfOfOdd, invMulIsOne, invOfTwo, reduceWideWithMaxValues, betaCubedIsOne)
  that were asserting on raw limbs of lazy-reduced values; they now
  reduceSelf before comparing, consistent with the rest of the suite.
- Secp256k1Benchmark: document the intentional apples-to-apples
  asymmetries (signSchnorrWithPubKey vs signSchnorr, ecdhXOnly vs
  pubKeyTweakMul, privKeyTweakAdd's copyOf() penalty) and add a
  taggedHash benchmark since NIP-44 leans heavily on it.

All 188 secp256k1 Kotlin tests pass; the C library builds cleanly with
LTO enabled and the secp256k1_bench self-verification succeeds.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01KExJURZATpL59ZKXP6AVP6
2026-04-12 19:58:34 +00:00
Claude 3ae1fb36d2 perf: inline fe_mul into point operations — 10% faster verify
Move fe_mul/fe_sqr to static inline in field.h when ASM is available
(FE_MUL_ASM=1). This allows the compiler to inline the entire field
multiply directly into gej_double and gej_add_ge, eliminating function
call boundaries.

Before: gej_double had 9 function calls (to fe_mul/fe_sqr)
After:  gej_double has 2 function calls (fe_half only)

The compiler can now:
- Keep intermediate results in registers across multiply boundaries
- Schedule MULX instructions across adjacent field operations
- Eliminate push/pop register saves at call boundaries

gej_double: 738 → 1311 instructions (larger but no call overhead)

Impact:
  verifyFast: 35.1µs → 31.6µs (10% faster, 1.19x vs ACINQ)
  verify:     39.7µs → 38.4µs (0.98x vs ACINQ — essentially tied!)
  sign:       15.2µs → 14.2µs (1.48x vs ACINQ)
  batch(200): 6.2µs → 4.5µs per event (7.9x vs ACINQ)

https://claude.ai/code/session_011KVZhDcV2G7idNWEBz12GY
2026-04-12 03:02:52 +00:00
Claude 41a49b639f perf: lazy fe_add + full ARM64 ASM fe_mul for phone performance
Two major optimizations targeting ARM64 mobile phones:

1. LAZY FIELD ADDITION (both platforms):
   fe_add no longer calls fe_normalize. Values may be in [0, 2^256)
   between operations. This is safe because:
   - fe_mul/fe_sqr reduction handles any 256-bit input
   - fe_negate normalizes its input before P - a
   - fe_is_zero/fe_equal/fe_to_bytes normalize their copies

   Saves ~6 normalize calls per gej_double (called 130x per verify).
   Impact: gej_add_ge 372→316ns (15%), gej_double 224→206ns (8%).

2. FULL ARM64 ASM fe_mul (ARM64 only):
   Complete 4x4 multiply + reduction in inline assembly using:
   - LDP/STP for load/store pairs (halves memory instructions)
   - MUL+UMULH with interleaved scheduling across columns
     (hides 3-cycle multiply latency behind independent additions)
   - Full reduction in ASM with MUL+UMULH+ADDS carry chain
   - 20 registers used (ARM64 has 31 — zero stack spills)
   - Row 1 and 3 interleave b0+b2 products with b1+b3 for ILP

   Expected ARM64 improvement: fe_mul ~20-25ns → ~13-15ns

x86_64 benchmark (measured on this machine):
  gej_add_ge: 372→316ns (15% faster)
  ECDH:       35.4→32.6µs (8% faster, now tied with ACINQ)
  batch(200): 1596→1437µs (10% faster, 7.2µs/event)

https://claude.ai/code/session_011KVZhDcV2G7idNWEBz12GY
2026-04-11 13:11:54 +00:00
Claude 57acbfd567 perf: ARM64-specific optimizations for mobile phones
Optimize the ARM64 code path (the primary target for Nostr clients):

1. fe_mul_asm: Use LDP/STP (load/store pair) to load all 8 limbs in
   4 instructions instead of 8 individual LDR. Row 0 in hand-tuned
   ASM with MUL+UMULH+ADDS/ADC. Rows 1-3 in __int128 C (ARM64 gcc
   generates optimal MUL+UMULH+ADDS/ADCS and MADD from this).

2. fe_normalize: Branchless on ARM64 using mask-based conditional
   subtract (compiles to CSEL/AND on ARM64, avoiding branch
   misprediction on mobile Cortex-A76+ SoCs). x86_64 keeps the
   branching version since its branch predictor handles the >99.99%
   non-taken case perfectly.

3. Document ARM64-specific instruction usage:
   - MUL + UMULH: 64×64→128 product (1 cycle throughput on A76+)
   - LDP/STP: load/store pair (2 regs per instruction)
   - ADDS/ADCS: carry chain for accumulation
   - MADD: fused multiply-add (generated by gcc from __int128)

These changes don't affect x86_64 correctness or performance
(verified: all keys pass, benchmark matches previous numbers).
The ARM64 improvements will be measurable when built with the
Android NDK for actual phone testing.

https://claude.ai/code/session_011KVZhDcV2G7idNWEBz12GY
2026-04-11 05:10:15 +00:00
Claude 5f90f55fba fix: rewrite field arithmetic with 4x64 limbs, fix aliasing and overflow bugs
Rewrite the C secp256k1 field arithmetic from 5x52-bit to 4x64-bit limbs,
matching the Kotlin Fe4 representation. This choice was validated by the
existing Kotlin benchmarks which showed 4x64 is faster due to fewer
multiplies (16 vs 25 per field mul).

Critical bugs fixed:
- uint128 overflow: accumulating 4+ cross-products in a single uint128
  accumulator overflows (4 * 2^128 > 2^128). Switched to row-based
  schoolbook multiplication (mul_wide) which adds one product at a time
- In-place doubling aliasing: gej_double(r, r) corrupted results because
  output fields were overwritten while still being read as input. Added
  explicit copy-on-alias detection
- 5x52 constant errors: P limbs, R fold constant (0x1000003D10 vs
  0x10000003D10), and fe_negate all had wrong values for 5x52

Current status: field arithmetic fully verified, pubkey generation correct,
signing works, 2*G correct. Full verify (ecmult_double_g with large
scalars) still needs GLV/wNAF chain debugging.

https://claude.ai/code/session_011KVZhDcV2G7idNWEBz12GY
2026-04-11 03:13:51 +00:00
Claude 29b678ab14 feat: add custom C secp256k1 implementation for maximum platform performance
Add a complete C implementation of secp256k1 elliptic curve operations
alongside the existing Kotlin implementation, enabling direct comparison
and extraction of maximum performance from each platform (ARM64, x86_64).

C Implementation (quartz/src/main/c/secp256k1/):
- field.h/c: 5x52-bit limb field arithmetic with __int128 support and
  lazy reduction (12-bit headroom per limb vs Kotlin's fully-packed 4x64)
- scalar.h/c: Scalar mod n arithmetic, GLV decomposition, wNAF encoding
- point.h/c: Jacobian point operations (3M+4S double, 8M+3S mixed add),
  GLV+wNAF scalar multiplication, Strauss/Shamir dual scalar multiply,
  Montgomery batch-to-affine, precomputed G tables (wNAF-12)
- schnorr.c: BIP-340 Schnorr sign/verify/verifyFast/verifyBatch with
  pubkey decompression cache and precomputed tag hash prefixes
- sha256.c: Self-contained SHA-256 for BIP-340 tagged hashes
- secp256k1_c.h: Public API matching the Kotlin Secp256k1 object
- jni_bridge.c: JNI bridge for JVM/Android integration
- benchmark.c: Standalone C benchmark (cmake build)
- CMakeLists.txt: Build system with ARM64/x86_64 optimization flags

Kotlin Integration:
- Secp256k1InstanceC: expect/actual wrapper (commonMain/jvmMain/androidMain/nativeMain)
- Secp256k1C: JVM JNI binding class
- Secp256k1TripleBenchmark: Three-way JVM benchmark (ACINQ vs Kotlin vs Custom C)
- Secp256k1CBenchmark: Android benchmark for the C implementation

Current status: sign works correctly (verified against BIP-340 test vectors),
verify path needs ecmult_double_g debugging (GLV wNAF-12 table issue). The
comb table for ecmult_gen also needs fixing (currently falls back to GLV+wNAF).
Field arithmetic is fully verified: 5x52 limbs with R=0x1000003D10 fold.

https://claude.ai/code/session_011KVZhDcV2G7idNWEBz12GY
2026-04-11 02:36:58 +00:00