Files
amethyst/.claude/skills/compose-stability-diagnostics/SKILL.md
T
Claude 5177168583 docs(skills): vendor 10 Compose/Kotlin technique-layer skills
Adds technique-oriented Compose and Kotlin skills from chrisbanes/skills
to complement the existing codebase-oriented skills. Codebase skills cover
"where is X in Amethyst"; these cover "what is the correct Compose/Kotlin
design". Descriptions tagged as technique-layer and cross-links trimmed to
the vendored subset. CLAUDE.md skill table updated with a dedicated section.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01QE8CjoJXUt7RKtwGgzeMrb
2026-05-14 12:59:46 +00:00

6.3 KiB

name, description
name description
compose-stability-diagnostics Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose parameter stability, compiler reports, skippability, unstable UI state classes, collection parameters, or Kotlin 2.0+ strong skipping behavior. Technique-layer skill — complements the codebase-specific compose-expert and kotlin-expert.

Compose stability diagnostics

Core principle

Compose performance problems from parameters are about whether inputs compare cheaply and predictably across recompositions. With Kotlin 2.0.20+ strong skipping is enabled by default, so unstable parameters no longer automatically make restartable composables non-skippable. That does not make stability irrelevant: unstable parameters are compared by instance identity (===), stable parameters by equality (equals), and churny instances can still defeat skipping.

First identify the compiler mode you are on, then read reports in that context.

When to use this skill

  • A composable or screen recomposes more than expected and parameter churn is suspected.
  • A UI-state/model class is passed to composables and contains List, Set, Map, ranges, Java time/money types, or third-party types.
  • composables.txt / classes.txt shows unstable parameters or non-skippable composables.
  • A project uses Kotlin < 2.0.20, disables strong skipping, or has old Compose compiler report guidance.

1. Start with strong skipping

On Kotlin 2.0.20+, strong skipping is enabled by default. In that mode:

  • Restartable composables are skippable even when parameters are unstable, unless explicitly opted out.
  • Stable parameters compare with equals.
  • Unstable parameters compare with instance equality (===).
  • Lambdas inside composables are automatically remembered based on captures.

That means the question changes from "is this composable skippable at all?" to "will these parameters compare the way I expect, and are callers creating new unstable instances every frame?"

For older compiler setups or strong skipping disabled, the legacy rule still matters: a restartable composable with unstable parameters may be restartable but not skippable.

2. Generate compiler reports

With Kotlin 2.0+ the Compose Compiler is configured through the Kotlin Gradle plugin:

plugins {
    alias(libs.plugins.android.application) // or android.library / jvm
    alias(libs.plugins.kotlin.android)      // or kotlin.multiplatform / kotlin.jvm
    alias(libs.plugins.compose.compiler)
}

if (providers.gradleProperty("composeReports").orNull == "true") {
    composeCompiler {
        reportsDestination = layout.buildDirectory.dir("compose_compiler")
        metricsDestination = layout.buildDirectory.dir("compose_compiler")
    }
}

Then build the variant whose compiler configuration you care about, for example:

./gradlew :app:assembleRelease -PcomposeReports=true

Use release/non-debuggable builds for runtime profiling. Compiler reports are build-time outputs, so the important thing is matching the variant and compiler flags you ship.

Key files:

File What it tells you
<module>-classes.txt Stability of classes and properties
<module>-composables.txt Restartable/skippable status and parameter stability
<module>-composables.csv Same data in sortable form
<module>-module.json Aggregate metrics

3. Fix stability where semantics need it

Pick the lightest fix that makes the type's immutability or equality semantics true.

Immutable collections

kotlin.collections.List is an interface; Compose cannot know the runtime implementation is immutable. Prefer kotlinx.collections.immutable at UI-state boundaries:

// Before: unstable collection interfaces
data class UiState(val items: List<Item>, val tags: Set<String>)

// After: immutable collection contracts
import kotlinx.collections.immutable.ImmutableList
import kotlinx.collections.immutable.ImmutableSet

data class UiState(val items: ImmutableList<Item>, val tags: ImmutableSet<String>)

Producers convert once at the boundary with .toImmutableList() / .toImmutableSet().

@Immutable / @Stable

  • Use @Immutable when every property is effectively immutable and equality describes all observable state.
  • Use @Stable for types whose mutable state is observable by Compose, typically via MutableState.

Do not annotate to silence a report. A false stability promise can produce stale UI.

Third-party immutable types

For types you cannot annotate, use stabilityConfigurationFiles:

composeCompiler {
    stabilityConfigurationFiles.add(
        rootProject.layout.projectDirectory.file("compose_stability.conf"),
    )
}
java.math.BigDecimal
java.math.BigInteger
java.time.*
kotlinx.datetime.*

Only list types you are willing to promise are immutable. Do not list mutable types such as java.util.Date.

Quick reference

Symptom Diagnosis Fix
Kotlin 2.0.20+ but old docs say unstable means non-skippable Strong skipping changed the default Check comparison semantics and instance churn instead
unstable val items: List<Item> Interface collection Use ImmutableList<Item> or another true immutable wrapper
unstable val price: BigDecimal External immutable type Add to stability config
@Immutable on a type with mutable internals False promise Fix the model or remove the annotation
Composable skips poorly despite strong skipping New unstable instance each recomposition Remember, hoist, or make the type stable/equality-based
Reports not generated Compose compiler plugin missing or flag not set Apply org.jetbrains.kotlin.plugin.compose and enable destinations

When NOT to apply

  • The issue is a fast-changing State read in composition, such as scroll or animation. Use compose-state-deferred-reads.
  • The recomposition count matches real data changes.
  • The bug is wrong data or stale state, not excess work.
  • The code is test-only and readability is more important than report cleanliness.