46926a712b
The runner's `multiplexing` testcase opens N parallel bidi streams,
each downloading one file, and asserts every file's content lands
on the right stream. Existing tests cover pieces of that:
- MultiplexingThroughputTest: opens 1000 streams in <2s — measures
lock contention but never moves bytes server-side.
- MultiplexingCoalescingTest: pins that 64 streams coalesce into ≤6
packets — encoder contract, no end-to-end.
- MultiStreamFinDeliveryTest: server pushes responses to 50 streams,
client surfaces every FIN — but the CLIENT never sends a STREAM
frame in that test, so any regression in the writer's request-
side multiplex path is invisible.
This test runs the full request → response loop:
1. Open 64 parallel bidi streams
2. Each enqueues a tiny request + FIN
3. Drain client outbound → decrypt → assert all 64 STREAM frames
made it across, with their request bytes intact
4. Server sends one response per stream + FIN
5. Per-stream incoming.toList() must yield the expected response
Failures call out the specific stream id, so a regression points
at "stream X dropped its FIN" instead of a generic timeout.
64 streams keeps wall-clock under a second; the bug class the test
guards against (per-stream loss / mis-routing) fires identically at
64 and 1999.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01HcvfQq1ttPV9PkRoJb4nyT