Files
amethyst/geode/plans/2026-05-07-event-ingestion-batching.md
T
Claude 176fa6f3b1 docs(geode): plan reflects VerifyAuthOnlyPolicy split
Tier 3 used to say operators "must omit VerifyPolicy from their
policy chain" when parallelVerify is on — that turned out to be
the AUTH-verify regression caught in the audit. Updated the plan
to describe the real wiring: VerifyPolicy was split into a
parameterised base with two singletons, and composePolicy swaps in
VerifyAuthOnlyPolicy so AUTH commands keep signature verification
even when the IngestQueue takes EVENT verify.
2026-05-07 23:19:13 +00:00

149 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Event ingestion: write batching + pipelined OK
## Problem
EVENT acceptance is the hot path on a busy relay — every published note,
every reaction, every DM lands here. Today the per-event flow is fully
serial:
1. `RelaySession.handleEvent` (`quartz/nip01Core/relay/server/RelaySession.kt:131`)
awaits `policy.accept(cmd)` (Schnorr verify if `VerifyPolicy` is in
the stack — ~0.1 ms on JVM).
2. Awaits `store.insert(cmd.event)` — a single SQLite write, guarded by
the connection-pool writer mutex (`SQLiteConnectionPool`).
3. Sends `OkMessage` back through the writer coroutine.
`LoadBenchmark.publishThroughputSingleClient` measured **~760 EPS**;
the concurrent variant **~2000 EPS** (limited by SQLite writer mutex
contention, not WS throughput).
## Constraints we must keep
- **OK pairs by event id, not by order**: the OK frame carries the
event id, so clients pair replies to publishes by id. OKs can be
emitted in any order — including reordered against the EVENT
stream, and against each other on the same connection. This frees
us to fan OKs out as soon as the writer has a per-row decision.
- **OK semantics = accepted, not fsynced**: NIP-01 treats `OK true`
as "accepted by the relay," not "durably on disk." We can reply as
soon as SQLite returns success for the row (inside the open
transaction, before commit/fsync). Group commit can batch the
fsync without holding OKs back.
- **Per-row decision still required**: the OK reason field is
per-event (duplicate, blocked, invalid sig, pow, etc.), so we
cannot fan out a single batch-level OK. Each row's OK must reflect
that row's outcome.
## Sketch
### Tier 1 — SQLite WAL + group commit (cheap win)
WAL is already on (`PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL`). The pool runs with
`PRAGMA synchronous=OFF`, which is one notch more permissive than
the originally-sketched `synchronous=NORMAL` — we keep it as-is
because the project already accepted the OS-crash trade-off there.
Group commit is implemented via a new `IEventStore.batchInsert`:
the SQLite override holds the writer mutex once and wraps N events
in one `BEGIN IMMEDIATE … COMMIT`. Per-row error isolation uses
SAVEPOINTs so one bad event (expired, duplicate id) doesn't roll
back the good ones — just that row reports `Rejected`.
OKs fire as soon as each row's outcome is known inside the writer
batch, not waiting for fsync (per the OK-semantics constraint above).
Implementation lives in `quartz/nip01Core/store/sqlite/SQLiteEventStore.batchInsertEvents`,
exposed through `IEventStore.batchInsert` and consumed by the new
`IngestQueue` (Tier 2 below).
Expected: **~510× write throughput** on a fast SSD. SQLite group
commit is well-trodden territory (nostr-rs-relay, strfry both do it).
### Tier 2 — pipelined OK over multiple in-flight EVENTs
`RelaySession.receive` was single-flight: one EVENT in, process, OK
out, next EVENT. With Tier 2 the connection's pump posts to the
shared `IngestQueue` and returns immediately — the WS pump moves
straight to the next frame.
`IngestQueue` (one per `NostrServer`) holds a bounded
`Channel<Submission>` (capacity = 1024 per the `DEFAULT_CAPACITY`
constant) drained by a single writer coroutine. The writer pulls
the first item to start a batch then `tryReceive`-drains everything
else queued (up to 64 — `DEFAULT_MAX_BATCH`), feeds the whole batch
to `IEventStore.batchInsert`, and dispatches each row's
`onComplete` callback as soon as the batch returns. The callback
turns into the `OK` frame at the WS layer.
OKs are not order-preserving (per the constraints above). The
writer coroutine starts lazily on first `submit` so subscription-
only sessions don't pay for it and don't perturb `Dispatchers.Default`
scheduling.
Expected: hides verify+insert latency behind the next EVENT's parse,
gets us closer to network-bound throughput.
### Tier 3 — eager Schnorr verify off the writer thread
`VerifyPolicy` ran synchronously on `receive`, serialising verify
on each connection's pump coroutine. With Tier 3, `IngestQueue`
takes a `verify: ((Event) -> Boolean)?` hook; when set, the writer
fan-outs a `coroutineScope { events.map { async(Default) { verify(it) } }.awaitAll() }`
on each batch before opening the SQLite transaction. Failed
verifies pre-mark `Rejected` and skip the insert.
Wired through `NostrServer(parallelVerify = ...)` and
`geode.Relay(parallelVerify = ...)`, controlled by
`[options].parallel_verify` in the relay config (default `true`)
and `--no-parallel-verify` on the CLI. Internal direct callers of
`NostrServer` (tests, library users) are opt-in: the flag defaults
to `false` to keep existing `VerifyPolicy`-in-chain semantics
unchanged.
`VerifyPolicy` was split into a parameterised
`VerifyEventsAndAuthPolicy(verifyEvents)` with two singletons:
- `VerifyPolicy` (default): verifies both `EVENT` and `AUTH`.
- `VerifyAuthOnlyPolicy`: verifies `AUTH` only, used when the
`IngestQueue` is doing the EVENT verify.
When `parallelVerify` is on, `composePolicy` swaps `VerifyPolicy`
for `VerifyAuthOnlyPolicy` so EVENTs aren't verified twice while
AUTH commands — which bypass the queue entirely — keep their
signature check. Without this split, removing `VerifyPolicy` from
the chain would let a forged AUTH event mark a pubkey as
authenticated.
Expected: ≈CPU_COUNT× verify-step speed-up on burst publishes
from a single connection, where verify was previously serial on
that pump.
## How to verify
`geode.perf.LoadBenchmark` carries the perf tests:
- `publishGroupCommitSingleClient` — sequential publish-and-confirm
on one connection (the same shape as the original
`publishThroughputSingleClient`). Synchronous publishing means
batch size is always 1, so this case shows per-event SQLite tx
cost rather than the group-commit win — kept as a 500-EPS floor
to catch regressions from the rewrite.
- `publishPipelinedSingleClient` — bursts 10 000 EVENTs back-to-
back without awaiting intermediate OKs; verifies end-to-end
throughput and that every event id receives exactly one OK (in
any order). This is where Tier 1 + Tier 2 both light up.
Existing benchmarks stay as the regression floor.
## Risks
- **Group commit windows**: if a single bad event in the batch fails
validation, we must not roll back the good ones. The batch needs
per-row commit semantics (row-level errors → row-level OK false).
- **Backpressure on slow disks**: deeper pipelines on slow storage
amplify out-of-memory pressure. Cap the in-flight queue depth and
apply existing slow-client backpressure if it fills.
- **Replay protection**: the existing dedupe table needs to see the
event before commit, not after — keep that check inside the writer
coroutine.