5177168583
Adds technique-oriented Compose and Kotlin skills from chrisbanes/skills to complement the existing codebase-oriented skills. Codebase skills cover "where is X in Amethyst"; these cover "what is the correct Compose/Kotlin design". Descriptions tagged as technique-layer and cross-links trimmed to the vendored subset. CLAUDE.md skill table updated with a dedicated section. https://claude.ai/code/session_01QE8CjoJXUt7RKtwGgzeMrb
35 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: compose-recomposition-performance
|
|
description: Use when investigating Jetpack Compose recomposition performance, skippable/restartable composables, composables.txt or compiler reports, Layout Inspector recomposition counts, or frame-rate State reads in composition vs layout/draw, and it is not yet clear whether the cause is parameter stability or deferred reads. Technique-layer skill — complements the codebase-specific compose-expert.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Compose recomposition performance
|
|
|
|
Router only — deep fixes live in [`compose-stability-diagnostics`](../compose-stability-diagnostics/SKILL.md) and [`compose-state-deferred-reads`](../compose-state-deferred-reads/SKILL.md).
|
|
|
|
## Two axes
|
|
|
|
1. **Parameter stability / skipping** — can Compose skip this restartable composable; are arguments stable and comparable?
|
|
2. **Where `State` is read** — is frame-rate `State` read during composition vs layout/draw?
|
|
|
|
Either axis can dominate; they combine independently.
|
|
|
|
## Route here → focused skill
|
|
|
|
| Primary suspicion | Next skill |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Skipping, unstable params, compiler/`composables.txt` churn | [`compose-stability-diagnostics`](../compose-stability-diagnostics/SKILL.md) |
|
|
| Frame-rate `State` read phase (composition vs layout/draw) | [`compose-state-deferred-reads`](../compose-state-deferred-reads/SKILL.md) |
|
|
| Evidence for both | Apply both skills in parallel |
|
|
|
|
## Review order
|
|
|
|
1. Decide which axis fits the evidence; open the matching skill.
|
|
2. If unclear, sample both — stability churn vs composition-phase reads of fast `State`.
|
|
3. Re-measure after changes.
|
|
|
|
## When NOT to apply
|
|
|
|
- Recomposition tracks real data changes, or the bug is correctness not cost.
|
|
- No profiler / compiler signal suggests a problem.
|